In a situation where two formations approach opposite ends of a hazard, who has priority?

In a scenario where two formations approach opposite ends of a hazard, the formation proceeding to an appointment has priority. This decision is based on the principle that formations with a time-sensitive objective, such as an appointment, must be prioritized to ensure they adhere to necessary schedules or mission timelines. The urgency associated with their objectives can justify their right-of-way in such situations, as failing to meet an appointment could potentially impact operational effectiveness or mission readiness.

The other factors, such as size of the formation or presence of road guards, while possibly important in other contexts, do not override the immediate operational need presented by an appointment. Likewise, simply being the first formation to arrive at a hazard does not dictate priority unless it is also related to an impending time constraint or mission requirement. Thus, prioritizing those on a scheduled appointment aligns with effective leadership and operational flow within the context of military formations.